<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fear Based Marketing</title>
	<link>http://www.onlineopportunity.org/fear-based-marketing/</link>
	<description>A Review of Ways to Make Money Online</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineopportunity.org/fear-based-marketing/#comment-40672</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.onlineopportunity.org/fear-based-marketing/#comment-40672</guid>
		<description>[quote post="558"]if you build trust AND have a solid reason behind the limited time offer[/quote]

That's the key...if you have a solid reason behind the limited time offer.  There are very good reasons to offer an initially low price that goes up.  For new membership sites, it's helpful to have that core of early adopters for newcomers to interact with, for example.  A deal early on stimulates that.

It's the false pretenses marketing that I object to, and the use of fear as a motivator when there isn't a good reason.  

Examples are the Javascript timer countdown offers (e.g. "Offer good for the next 13 minutes only"), the use of server side scripting to create an artificial deadline of tomorrow, the artificial raising of prices to unreasonable levels after the first day or two just to motivate people to buy early.  

In that last example, offering a deal early on is a good technique, but that's been twisted into offering something for the regular price for a couple of days, calling it a deal, and then raising the price to more than any reasonable person would pay for it later.  

The prime difference for me is that the people using what I'd call unethical tactics are focused on getting money into their pocket as quickly as possible, while the others are focused on balancing what's right for their customers with their own need to make a profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header"><a href="http://www.onlineopportunity.org/fear-based-marketing/#comment-" title="View original comment"><cite>Jay</cite> wrote:</a></p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.onlineopportunity.org/fear-based-marketing/#comment-"><p>
if you build trust AND have a solid reason behind the limited time offer</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s the key&#8230;if you have a solid reason behind the limited time offer.  There are very good reasons to offer an initially low price that goes up.  For new membership sites, it&#8217;s helpful to have that core of early adopters for newcomers to interact with, for example.  A deal early on stimulates that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the false pretenses marketing that I object to, and the use of fear as a motivator when there isn&#8217;t a good reason.  </p>
<p>Examples are the Javascript timer countdown offers (e.g. &#8220;Offer good for the next 13 minutes only&#8221;), the use of server side scripting to create an artificial deadline of tomorrow, the artificial raising of prices to unreasonable levels after the first day or two just to motivate people to buy early.  </p>
<p>In that last example, offering a deal early on is a good technique, but that&#8217;s been twisted into offering something for the regular price for a couple of days, calling it a deal, and then raising the price to more than any reasonable person would pay for it later.  </p>
<p>The prime difference for me is that the people using what I&#8217;d call unethical tactics are focused on getting money into their pocket as quickly as possible, while the others are focused on balancing what&#8217;s right for their customers with their own need to make a profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineopportunity.org/fear-based-marketing/#comment-40610</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 06:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.onlineopportunity.org/fear-based-marketing/#comment-40610</guid>
		<description>You are right .. many people buy out of fear .. unfortunately, fear marketing still works for a lot of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right .. many people buy out of fear .. unfortunately, fear marketing still works for a lot of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineopportunity.org/fear-based-marketing/#comment-40592</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 04:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.onlineopportunity.org/fear-based-marketing/#comment-40592</guid>
		<description>Your post suggests that fear of loss is a bad thing and that using the "tactic" is a morally wrong thing to do because it isn't looking out for your prospect.
At least, that's what I get out of it.

It's the core of discussion when you talk to people who say "I could never be in sales...I have a concious."  

Give someone a choice of waiting to purchase (and forget) vs. giving someone motivation to "buy now...or else" ensures that your sales will decrease.  

Installing fear of loss is not a bad thing unless it's done under false pretenses.  

For example.  If you say you are going to limit the amount of sales at a particular price, make sure that you stick to it.  To me it's all about integrity.  I see nothing wrong with creating urgency.

How do you suggest to create urgency without instilling some sort of fear of loss?

Recently, I polled my customers in my support forum because I was considering opening up more membership slots for my online service.  I opened up my Promo Code Software to 300 charter members because I thought that was all I could handle.  It was a combination of "fear of loss" and a legitimate reason to do so.

What I found is that I have a a very low support ticket ratio with the members I have.  So I posed the question to my customers...."should I increase the amount of lifetime memberships or should I stick with my original 300 before I go to a monthly fee based membership?"

Well, surprisingly enough, more than 60 percent said I should stick with my original plan.

It all boils down to trust in my eyes.  Many of my customers purchased because the KNEW that they would pay more in the future unless the made a decision NOW....

They want me to stick to that.

To me...if you build trust AND have a solid reason behind the limited time offer...it's very ethical...and a good way to do business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post suggests that fear of loss is a bad thing and that using the &#8220;tactic&#8221; is a morally wrong thing to do because it isn&#8217;t looking out for your prospect.<br />
At least, that&#8217;s what I get out of it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the core of discussion when you talk to people who say &#8220;I could never be in sales&#8230;I have a concious.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Give someone a choice of waiting to purchase (and forget) vs. giving someone motivation to &#8220;buy now&#8230;or else&#8221; ensures that your sales will decrease.  </p>
<p>Installing fear of loss is not a bad thing unless it&#8217;s done under false pretenses.  </p>
<p>For example.  If you say you are going to limit the amount of sales at a particular price, make sure that you stick to it.  To me it&#8217;s all about integrity.  I see nothing wrong with creating urgency.</p>
<p>How do you suggest to create urgency without instilling some sort of fear of loss?</p>
<p>Recently, I polled my customers in my support forum because I was considering opening up more membership slots for my online service.  I opened up my Promo Code Software to 300 charter members because I thought that was all I could handle.  It was a combination of &#8220;fear of loss&#8221; and a legitimate reason to do so.</p>
<p>What I found is that I have a a very low support ticket ratio with the members I have.  So I posed the question to my customers&#8230;.&#8221;should I increase the amount of lifetime memberships or should I stick with my original 300 before I go to a monthly fee based membership?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, surprisingly enough, more than 60 percent said I should stick with my original plan.</p>
<p>It all boils down to trust in my eyes.  Many of my customers purchased because the KNEW that they would pay more in the future unless the made a decision NOW&#8230;.</p>
<p>They want me to stick to that.</p>
<p>To me&#8230;if you build trust AND have a solid reason behind the limited time offer&#8230;it&#8217;s very ethical&#8230;and a good way to do business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.619 seconds -->
